1 |
I've ordered SanDisk 1TB Extreme Portable SSD. |
2 |
Would format it with ext4 but if I do it, it will not work with cell |
3 |
phone. So for now I think I'll stick with exFat (default it comes |
4 |
with). It might be OK for picture backup but my exFat will stripped |
5 |
extended attributes from my Linux files. |
6 |
|
7 |
Thelma |
8 |
On 10/03/2018 11:58 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
9 |
> On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 8:24:52 AM CEST John Covici wrote: |
10 |
>> On Wed, 03 Oct 2018 01:13:34 -0400, |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> J. Roeleveld wrote: |
13 |
>>> On Wednesday, October 3, 2018 6:30:12 AM CEST Davyd McColl wrote: |
14 |
>>>> Most newer external storage devices come formatted with ntfs these days, |
15 |
>>>> so |
16 |
>>>> if you just want to plug-and-play, I suggest installing ntfs-3g. File |
17 |
>>>> managers like dolphin and desktop environments like KDE will notice the |
18 |
>>>> device and allow you to mount and use them. |
19 |
>>>> |
20 |
>>>> Be aware, though, that ntfs-3g, whilst being an excellent bit of |
21 |
>>>> software |
22 |
>>>> (imo), is not the fastest way to access those disks. If you have no need |
23 |
>>>> to |
24 |
>>>> move the disk to another computer or if you only plan on moving between |
25 |
>>>> Linux computers, I suggest formatting with a native filesystem like |
26 |
>>>> ext4. |
27 |
>>>> Personally, I use ntfs-3g for my 4 large external disks so that I can |
28 |
>>>> access them when I infrequently dual-boot to windows of on the |
29 |
>>>> off-chance |
30 |
>>>> that I would like to lend the drive to someone. I accept the performance |
31 |
>>>> penalty. |
32 |
>>>> |
33 |
>>>> -d |
34 |
>>>> |
35 |
>>>> On October 3, 2018 05:45:58 thelma@×××××××××××.com wrote: |
36 |
>>>>> Are all external storage, media/disk work with Linux? |
37 |
>>>>> Any recommendations, or which one to stay away from. |
38 |
>>>>> |
39 |
>>>>> Some of them are encrypted, so I suppose they will not work with Linux |
40 |
>>>>> out of the box. |
41 |
>>>>> |
42 |
>>>>> -- |
43 |
>>>>> Thelma |
44 |
>>> |
45 |
>>> I would assume other desktop environments will also seamlessly work with |
46 |
>>> ntfs-3g as that is handled by udisks. |
47 |
>>> |
48 |
>>> Personally, I have not noticed lesser performance with ntfs-3g with both |
49 |
>>> reading and writing. |
50 |
>>> |
51 |
>>> I also have not had any issues with encrypted disks. |
52 |
>> |
53 |
>> I have had problems that once a disk is mounted with ntfs3g, and then |
54 |
>> trying to use it on a Windows system, I had to do a chkdsk /f before |
55 |
>> it would work properly. This was a while ago, so maybe things are |
56 |
>> fixed by now, but I thought it was worth bringing it to your |
57 |
>> attention. |
58 |
> |
59 |
> I only encounter this when people decide to unplug the disk without ejecting |
60 |
> it. The eject forces a clearance of the write-cache. |
61 |
> This is why I always get annoyed with people who simply pull out the disk/ |
62 |
> stick right after the copy is "finished". |
63 |
> |
64 |
> -- |
65 |
> Joost |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> |
69 |
> |
70 |
> |