| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: |
| 5 |
> That's not true. Up to 2.6.17.5 it /may/ eat your data. I ran |
| 6 |
> 2.6.17, in the buggy state, for >2 weeks before I upgraded. It did |
| 7 |
> _not_ eat my data. Don't get me wrong - it was lucky, and yes - it's |
| 8 |
> a heinous bug. If it just _ate_ your data, more people would have |
| 9 |
> lost data and or filesystems. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Well, I ran it then and didn't lose data or filesystems (very lucky), |
| 12 |
but I switched to JFS because it was far faster on many things on my |
| 13 |
system (such as deleting large numbers of files). I guess everyone has |
| 14 |
different experiences with these relatively new filesystems (XFS and JFS)... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Chris |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iD8DBQFFRNlIUx1jS/ORyCsRCL1CAKCPYF7T7phDAoLOaJwXFH7okvrYqwCdHbgX |
| 21 |
hcotFCWcDVjLIu14lFMLWuY= |
| 22 |
=yg4P |
| 23 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives