| 1 |
Am 19.01.2015 um 09:32 schrieb Bill Kenworthy: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Can someone suggest what is causing a balance on this raid 1, 3 disk |
| 4 |
> volume to successfully complete but leave the data unevenly distributed? |
| 5 |
> Content is mostly VM images. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> sdc and sdd are 2TB WD greens, and sda is a 2TB WD red. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Question: was /dev/sda a smaller HDD before the 2 TB WD red? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If your sda was around 250 GB before you changed it with 2 TB, did you |
| 12 |
just issue a "btrfs balance" after that? If so, Btrfs just configured |
| 13 |
itself for 2*2 TB + 1*250 GB, that's why. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The proper Btrfs way if replacing a smaller hdd for a bigger one in Raid |
| 16 |
1 is to issue "btrfs filesystem resize" to make it use all of the |
| 17 |
available space. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This would be one possible explanation for the behaviour of your array. |
Archives