1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:52 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, David W Noon |
2 |
did opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:20:03 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote about Re: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: |
7 |
> >Sounds like you want a --really-all suboption to -C |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Basically, yes. I want it on -C and -c runs of emerge. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> This means it would not be applicable to upgrade or rebuild runs, when |
12 |
> they do their removal of files from the previous version. In fact, |
13 |
> rebuilds seldom remove files from the previous version, as it is the |
14 |
> same as the new version; only USE flag changes can mess with the |
15 |
> package manifest. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> >You could submit a feature request at b.g.o. but I feel the odds of |
18 |
> >getting it implemented (or even a working patch accepted at all) are |
19 |
> >rather low. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> >Your suggestion runs counter to the general philosophy that runs |
22 |
> >through Gentoo. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> In what way? Since it would be an option, it would not diminish the |
25 |
> control the user has over the machine. |
26 |
|
27 |
If you can provide solid examples where standard Gentoo tools do this |
28 |
operation: |
29 |
|
30 |
"I don't know what this is, but I'm just going to delete/modify/change it |
31 |
anyway" |
32 |
|
33 |
then I'll concede you may have a point and be willing to discuss it further. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |