Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug?
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:50:00
Message-Id: 20090518014954.061ae8c9@ilievnet.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] portage bug? by Peter Alfredsen
1 On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:36:56 +0200
2 Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300
5 > Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote:
6 >
7 > >
8 > > Hi,
9 > >
10 > >
11 > > Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file
12 > > a report with B.G.O?
13 > >
14 > >
15 > > % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml
16 > [...]
17 > > % emerge --update --newuse --deep world
18 > > Calculating dependencies... done!
19 > > >>> Auto-cleaning packages...
20 > >
21 > > >>> No outdated packages were found on your system.
22 >
23 > Try to add --with-bdeps=y and I think you'll find the expected
24 > behavior.
25 >
26 >
27
28 Yes, that's it. Strange, I was under the impression that bdeps was "yes"
29 by default.
30
31 Thanks, guys, and sorry for the noise.
32
33 --
34 Best regards,
35 Daniel

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug? Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug? Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>