1 |
On Monday 30 May 2011 11:33:02 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 12:10 on Monday 30 May 2011, Alan Mackenzie |
3 |
|
4 |
> > Can't say I blame you. What's the choice, though? I appreciate the |
5 |
> > spare uncluttered desktop of Gnome. Last time I tried KDE (about 7 years |
6 |
> > ago) it was anything but uncluttered. I tried XFCE briefly, but couldn't |
7 |
> > get it to run stably. Besides, it was missing an application to switch |
8 |
> > between keyboard layouts, something I absolutely need. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I hear good things about XFCE these days. If you haven't tried it lately, |
11 |
> it might be worth a new look. And you can always write a small script to |
12 |
> change your keyboard layout if there's no gui app. Not as convenient as a |
13 |
> systray icon, but probably a small price to pay if everything else suits |
14 |
> your needs |
15 |
> |
16 |
> There's also other DEs like *box and e17. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> e17 requires a huge mind shift in how you perceive the desktop but once you |
19 |
> get your head around it, it becomes strangely addictive. |
20 |
|
21 |
KDE has changed *significantly* from 7 years ago. It will be a completely new |
22 |
experience for you and there are a number of LiveCDs/DVDs you can use to try |
23 |
it out and see if it meets your needs. |
24 |
|
25 |
Fluxbox which I have been using for years is ultimately configurable, but |
26 |
development is not really breathtaking and it does not do compiz or other |
27 |
composite eye-candy. It's fast, but some of its edges are jagged compared to |
28 |
more modern WMs. |
29 |
|
30 |
e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed, has |
31 |
enough eye candy (if you need that) and it is relatively configurable. Until |
32 |
it becomes stable you'll need to compile it from svn. |
33 |
|
34 |
Alan, I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "huge mind shift"? Unless my |
35 |
mind shifted and wasn't aware of it! :)) |
36 |
-- |
37 |
Regards, |
38 |
Mick |