Archives
Archives
| From: | Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 May 2009 14:32:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | 58965d8a0905040732n6a4918fevae98d296545a4277@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway? by "Arttu V." |
||
| 1 | On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:43 AM, Arttu V. <arttuv69@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Hello, |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Inspired by the other digicam thread I took a quick look at an older |
| 5 | > problem of mine, namely getting libgphoto2 to compile drivers for all |
| 6 | > cameras. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Anyone got a clue why *not* setting CAMERAS won't build drivers for |
| 9 | > all cameras as claimed several times in the libgphoto2 ebuild? |
| 10 | |
| 11 | src_configure() in the libgphoto2 ebuild looks like it handles the |
| 12 | none=all logic. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with CAMERAS anyway? | "Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com> |