1 |
Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:21:08 schrieb Paul Colquhoun: |
2 |
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 09:31:56 AM Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
3 |
> > Just don't expect everybody to run our systems without the modern |
4 |
> > parts of the stack just because a Commodore 64 cannot run it. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Many of us actually like the modern features of the kernel, glibc, |
7 |
> > udev, dbus, systemd, pulseaudio, glib, X.org, GStreamer, Gtk+ and |
8 |
> > GNOME (or Qt and KDE). In my case (and I have used Linux for a long |
9 |
> > time), the whole stack looks full of awsomeness, and stuff just works |
10 |
> > most of the time. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > So yeah, we use more CPU cycles, more memory and more hard drive. From |
13 |
> > my POV, we get more than that in new and improved functionality. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Just don't forget that the desktop isn't the whole world, and allow the |
16 |
> backroom server guys to turn off all the bells, whistles and pretty lights |
17 |
> so they can get the best performance from their web servers, mail servers, |
18 |
> DNS servers, etc. |
19 |
|
20 |
there are at least two kinds of servers - those who don't need bells and |
21 |
whistles and run happily on an intel atom. |
22 |
|
23 |
And those who really do need bells and whistles. I am sure you wouldn't want |
24 |
to build such from scratch. |
25 |
|
26 |
Luckily as a desktop linux user I do not have to care about those guys. And |
27 |
these guys don't have to care about me. Isn't that great? |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
#163933 |