| 1 |
Am 08.08.2012 11:33, schrieb Philip Webb: |
| 2 |
> 120808 Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Am 07.08.2012 07:02, schrieb Philip Webb: |
| 4 |
>>> Just an observation : when I updated Libre Office & Firefox this week, |
| 5 |
>>> neither compile used swap (I have 4 GB RAM); |
| 6 |
>>> OTOH when I did them the previous time, both did use swap; |
| 7 |
>>> the total time & the HDD usage remained almost the same. |
| 8 |
>>> In between, I updated the Kernel 3.0.0 -> 3.4.0 , |
| 9 |
>>> but made no other changes in config files etc. |
| 10 |
>> Did Firefox ever actually need to swap? Here it does a fair share |
| 11 |
>> of disk I/O (some python script?) but never actually needs lots of memory. |
| 12 |
>> With Libre Office, it could be their recent code cleaning effort. |
| 13 |
>> They removed large amounts of cruft. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Sorry, perhaps I didn't make it clear enough: |
| 16 |
> I'm refering to the process of compiling the pkgs via Portage, |
| 17 |
> not to using them after they have been installed. |
| 18 |
> Both packages used noticeably less memory during the compile stage |
| 19 |
> on the latest occasion in contrast to the previous Emerges. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
No, you made yourself clear. I didn't. I meant the compiling, too. |
Archives