| 1 |
2009/10/2 Arthur D. <spinal.by@××××.ru>: |
| 2 |
> Joshua Murphy <poisonbl@×××××.com> писал(а) в своём письме Fri, 02 Oct 2009 |
| 3 |
> 09:58:33 +0300: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> every Gentoo system has vi, there just isn't a direct |
| 6 |
>> symlink with that name to busybox. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Wow, that's a really great problem. |
| 9 |
> $ ln `which busybox` vi |
| 10 |
> $ ./vi |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> -- |
| 13 |
> Best regards, Spinal |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yeah... imagine that. A simple change to fix things to work as I want |
| 16 |
when I deviate from the distro default. Interestingly, I already do |
| 17 |
that, and into /bin/, on every lightweight system I build for myself |
| 18 |
(more full fledged builds have vim, and none of my builds keep nano |
| 19 |
around). Really, that seems just as simple to me as adjusting the |
| 20 |
config file for sudo when deviating from the distro-offered default. |
| 21 |
Simple solutions are an amazing thing, at least, when they're not |
| 22 |
blown away as unacceptable because the world doesn't revolve around |
| 23 |
every single person who think's they're at Burger King (oddly enough, |
| 24 |
in my experience, you don't actually get "your way" their either). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I would apologize for my rather sarcastic mannerisms in my comments |
| 27 |
here and there in the thread, but when the initial post is so terribly |
| 28 |
combative, I just can't help myself. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Poison [BLX] |
| 32 |
Joshua M. Murphy |
Archives