1 |
On Wednesday 22 June 2011 18:46:55 Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Neil Bothwick wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:54:49 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
4 |
> >>>> Use a directory for package.use, it makes it far easier to |
5 |
> >>>> manage. All of /etc/portage/package.* are directories here. |
6 |
> >>> |
7 |
> >>> I have done that for package.keywords and unmask. In ways it is |
8 |
> >>> easier but in ways, it is a nightmare. If something is unmasked, I |
9 |
> >>> have to go find the file that unmasked it. I have several since I |
10 |
> >>> use autounmask for most of it. Then add in that the new autounmask |
11 |
> >>> part of emerge seems to pick a random file to add too. At that |
12 |
> >>> point, not much makes sense anymore. |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> grep is your very very good friend |
15 |
|
16 |
Hear, hear! |
17 |
|
18 |
> > So is giving the files sensible names :) |
19 |
> |
20 |
> That was what I liked about autounmask, the tree version not the portage |
21 |
> one. It gave them some names at least. Still felt like looking for a |
22 |
> needle in a haystack sometimes tho. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'm with you, Dale. I have no /etc/portage/package.* directories here on |
25 |
this amd64 box - I just keep entries in alphabetical order in single files. I |
26 |
find it easier. |
27 |
|
28 |
I've also found it much easier to manage flags etc by setting the kde profile |
29 |
(this being a kde box, of course - gnome is too arrogant for me). It makes |
30 |
for a nice, simple USE line in make.conf. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Rgds |
34 |
Peter |