| 1 |
On Tuesday 07 Oct 2014 15:48:33 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 2 |
> 141007 Pavel Volkov wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday, October 5, 2014 9:10:50 PM MSK, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> I haven't used konqueror as a browser in many many months, |
| 5 |
> >> I get along just fine with Firefox and Chromium. |
| 6 |
> >> I believe Konqueror is essentially unmaintained these days |
| 7 |
> >> or at least on life support. Make a fine file manager though |
| 8 |
> >> (kparts has always been one of KDE's very much better ideas) |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > I think there was a tendency to replace Konqueror with rekonq |
| 11 |
> > in KDE-based distros. Can somebody comment on how rekonq is doing? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I dropped Konqueror as an alternative browser recently |
| 14 |
> after it refused to accept every URL as malformed. |
| 15 |
> Rekonq is an adequate replacement + Firefox for regular use ; |
| 16 |
> I also use Lynx when I want text copies of WWW dox. |
| 17 |
> My window manager is Fluxbox. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I still use Konqueror as file manager, ssh/ftp/webdav client and occasionally |
| 20 |
as an Internet browser. However, I have set it up to use WebKit as its |
| 21 |
browser engine instead of KHTML. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Mick |
Archives