1 |
On 18/03/12 03:45, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 17/03/12 13:53, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Hello, Nikos. |
6 |
>>> |
7 |
>>> On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 08:25:48AM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>>> Happy Computer Users, systemd is on your horizon. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>> No, we don't. I hope systemd arrives soon. It's the best init system I |
13 |
>>>> ever saw. |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> What's so good about it? What will it do for me? |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> I have this horrible sneaking suspicion that it will be more complicated |
19 |
>>> than /sbin/init + OpenRC, just like udev + initramfs is more complicated |
20 |
>>> than udev, and CUPS is more complicated than classical lpr. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>>> Why do you find it so good? |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> No idea. I only posted this because the OP didn't say what's bad about |
26 |
>> systemd :-) I really don't know I should care whether my system runs OpenRC |
27 |
>> or systemd. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Take this with a grain (or a kilo) of salt, since I'm obviously |
30 |
> biased, but IMHO this are systemd advantages over OpenRC: |
31 |
> |
32 |
>[...] |
33 |
> * It tries to unify Linux behaviour among distros (some can argue that |
34 |
> this is a bad thing): Using systemd, the same |
35 |
> configurations/techniques work the same in every distribution. No more |
36 |
> need to learn /etc/conf.d, /etc/sysconfig, /etc/default hacks by |
37 |
> different distros. |
38 |
|
39 |
Out of the things you listed, this strikes me as the most important. |
40 |
Linux really needs standards. When I install software on Windows, it |
41 |
knows how to add its startup services. On Linux, this is all manual |
42 |
work if your distro isn't supported, especially on Gentoo. If there's |
43 |
no ebuild for it, you spend your whole day trying to make it work. |