Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From:	Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>
To:	gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject:	[gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles?
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:48:37
Message-Id:	`qo25c6$2mf0$1@blaine.gmane.org`
In Reply to:	[gentoo-user] Re: virtual/pam masked but required by all non-hardened profiles? by Hartmut Figge

1	On 2019-10-14, Hartmut Figge <h.figge@×××.de> wrote:
2	> Grant Edwards:
3	>
4	>>This morning emerge is complaining that virtual/pam-0-r1 is masked and
5	>>scheduled for removal in 14 days. But virtual/pam is required by
6	>>sys-apps/shadow which is part of the base profiles.
7	>
8	> I was just bitten by that.
9	>
10	>>What am I missing?
11	>
12	> Time for waiting?
13
14	Probably. There's an ongoning discussion of this problem at
15
16	https://bugs.gentoo.org/683284
17
18	It appears that you have to run "emerge -1 shadow" fixes the problem
19	for _some_ people. So far, it's worked on the one system I've tried
20	to update today.
21
22	--
23	Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! TAILFINS!! ... click
24	at ...
25	gmail.com