| 1 |
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 02:09:35PM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I don't know if you're right but it makes sense. If I need e2label to |
| 4 |
> read labels from the CLI then I probably need all the same stuff in |
| 5 |
> the initramfs which this one doesn't have. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> The problem I have with that idea is that all I put in the RAID6 which |
| 8 |
> does have an initramfs is e2fsck, not e2label or anything else. |
| 9 |
> However maybe e2fsck has that capability and that's why it's working? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Good catch! |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks, and best wishes for the new year and a safe New Year's eve to all. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Cheers, |
| 16 |
> Mark |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I've deleted your OP (sorry), but also, the kernel autodetects RAID using |
| 19 |
metadata 0.90 superblocks, but not 1.2 superblock (seems your output had some |
| 20 |
of each?). |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
| 23 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
| 24 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
| 25 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
| 26 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
| 27 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |
Archives