| 1 |
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:40:25AM +0100, Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm about to compile a new kernel and running oldconfig brings up this new set |
| 5 |
> of options. There is no help available, grep-ping through the Documentation |
| 6 |
> wasn't particularly revealing and I haven't found anything in Google to help |
| 7 |
> me decide what I need/want out of the three: |
| 8 |
> =================================================== |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> * CPU/Task time and stats accounting |
| 11 |
> * |
| 12 |
> Cputime accounting |
| 13 |
> 1. Simple tick based cputime accounting (TICK_CPU_ACCOUNTING) |
| 14 |
> > 2. Full dynticks CPU time accounting (VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN) (NEW) |
| 15 |
> 3. Fine granularity task level IRQ time accounting (IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING) |
| 16 |
> choice[1-3]: ? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> There is no help available for this option. |
| 19 |
> Prompt: Cputime accounting |
| 20 |
> Location: |
| 21 |
> -> General setup |
| 22 |
> -> CPU/Task time and stats accounting |
| 23 |
> Defined at init/Kconfig:297 |
| 24 |
> Selected by: m |
| 25 |
> =================================================== |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Option 2 seems to have been selected by default, but I am not sure if this is |
| 28 |
> right for a laptop. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> What have you chosen and why? |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> Regards, |
| 34 |
> Mick |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Each of the three options has it's own individual help. |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Happy Penguin Computers >') |
| 39 |
126 Fenco Drive ( \ |
| 40 |
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ |
| 41 |
support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com |
| 42 |
662-269-2706 662-205-6424 |
| 43 |
http://happypenguincomputers.com/ |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 46 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 47 |
A: Top-posting. |
| 48 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting |
Archives