Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Sebastián Magrí" <sebasmagri@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants KDE4, I don't
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:03:32
Message-Id: 1227625192.4735.0.camel@supertux.cantv.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants KDE4, I don't by Nikos Chantziaras
1 El mar, 25-11-2008 a las 16:17 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras escribió:
2 > sebasmagri@×××××.com wrote:
3 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:18:11PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
4 > >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
5 > >>> I decided to give portage 2.1.6_rc1 a try. Now it wants to upgrade my
6 > >>> KDE3 to KDE4. I never unmasked or keyworded any KDE4 stuff. Any options
7 > >>> other than removing portage 2.1.6_rc1 again?
8 > >> On a similar note, what's the justification of having KDE4 in the same tree
9 > >> as KDE3? It's a different package altogether. It would have made more
10 > >> sense to have them in "kde4-base/*" etc.
11 > >>
12 > > Hi!
13 > >
14 > > kde3 and kde4 are slotted, so I don't think it's necessary to have
15 > > just-another-category for kde4... At last, kde4 is kde too...
16 > > in any case kde4 is willing to be installed without removing kde3...
17 > >
18 > > From my point of view it's impossible that portage upgrades kde3 to
19 > > kde4, if you really never unmasked or keyworded any kde stuff
20 >
21 > I didn't unmask nor keyword any *KDE4* stuff. Only KDE3. Previous
22 > portage was happy with that. The new portage is not. I have dozens of
23 > packages in package.keywords that look like this:
24 >
25 > kde-base/kdelibs
26 >
27 > Now portage wants to install the 4.1 versions of all those. The
28 > previous portage did not; I had to tell it to keyword the 4.1 versions
29 > if I wanted that.
30 >
31 >
32 Check the slots you used unmasking kde3 stuff... there is maybe the
33 explanation...