Re: [gentoo-user] procmail+spamassassin user filters

[Willie Wong]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:08:49AM +0200, Penguin Lover David Rioja squawked:
> Willie Wong escribi?:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Penguin Lover David Rioja
>> squawked:
>>
>>> 2.- I created ~/.procmail with the following contents:
>>>
>>> SHELL=/bin/sh
>>> MAILDIR=$HOME/.maildir
>>> DEFAULT=$MAILDIR
>>> LOGFILE=$MAILDIR/procmail.log
>>>
>>> | spamassassin --prefs-file=$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is that all you have in the recipe? I thought a recipe always begins
>> with 0: ? From my procmailrc file:
>>
>> -----------snip---------------
>> :0fw
>> | /usr/bin/spamc
>> ----------endsnip-------------
>>
>> since I use spamc/spamd. f makes it a filter and w waits for the
>> filter to finish.
>> W
>>
> Ok, you win :)
>
> I actually have this on .procmail
>
> INCLUDERC=$HOME/.spamassassin.rc
>
> instead of that line. In the file .spamassassin.rc I have:
>
> :0fw
> | spamassassin --prefs-file=$HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs

Another really stupid question, when you sayin your .procmail file, do
you mean $HOME/.procmailrc ? I certainly hope you just have a typo,
and not named your file something that procmail does not know is the
config file. 

(Was the ~/.maildir/procmail.log log file created?)

I am pretty sure the $HOME in your command should parse properly even
if procmail passes control to a subshell, so there shouldn't be any
reason why your recipe doesn't work. 

W

-- 
"It was real. At least, if it wasn't real, it did support 
them, and as that is what sofas are supposed to do, this, 
by any test that mattered, was a real sofa. "
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 677 days, 13:59