Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING dev-libs/icu-49.1 is BAD
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:53:55
Message-Id: 20120405135151.540a1089@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING dev-libs/icu-49.1 is BAD by Daniel Troeder
1 On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:36:54 +0200, Daniel Troeder wrote:
2
3 > Why can't ebuilds like icu be made like openssl or openldap where the
4 > libs are not replaced, but old libs stay and a text is displayed to use
5 > redep-rebuild and afterwards rm the old libs?
6
7 They are, the old libs stay around until you emerge @preserved-rebuild...
8 and then everything breaks.
9
10 > That way software doesn't suddenly brake until you reemerge half your
11 > desktop/servers (only to reemerge everything again the next day, because
12 > that lib gets suddenly masked).
13
14 In an ideal world, broken software wouldn't be released at all, but ~arch
15 is called testing for a reason and we have now tested icu-49.
16
17
18 --
19 Neil Bothwick
20
21 WinErr 00A: Promotional literature overflow - Mailbox full

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] WARNING dev-libs/icu-49.1 is BAD Daniel Troeder <daniel@×××××××××.com>