| 1 |
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:50:34 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yes there was the original news item - but nothing about the problems |
| 4 |
> this caused, and the back and forwarding which is causing me grief. It |
| 5 |
> is only switching targets, but when you have problems and decide to |
| 6 |
> remove 3.6 and recompile, then having to go through it all again |
| 7 |
> without proper information it has impact. A news item is supposed to |
| 8 |
> give information ... I am not criticising the changes itself (sh.. |
| 9 |
> happens), but being left in the dark about it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Agreed, the switch back occurred with no explanation, a news item should |
| 12 |
have been written for that, and maybe a brief warning one when |
| 13 |
reinstating the 3.6 setting. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Give a man a fish and you have fed him for a day, but give him a case of |
| 20 |
dynamite and soon the village will be showered with mud and seaweed and |
| 21 |
unidentifiable chunks of fish. |
Archives