| 1 |
On Sunday 22 March 2009 17:35:56 Michael P. Soulier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21/03/09 Nick Fortino said: |
| 3 |
> > Hmm, that's odd. gtk+ does flag the fact that it includes gail with the |
| 4 |
> > block you are running into, and gail-1000 is used to make programs which |
| 5 |
> > depend on gail happy. emerge -uDN world should really just take care of |
| 6 |
> > this, as gail should be upgraded to gail-1000. |
| 7 |
> > At the end of the day, Daniel is right, unmerging gail should resolve the |
| 8 |
> > block, and everything should work when you are done upgrading. Portage |
| 9 |
> > should (and did for me) take care of this on it's own though. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Hmm. Is it possible that I don't have the latest portage? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I have sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.7. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> emerge --pretend --update sys-apps/portage |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> shows nothing so I guess I have the latest one... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You have the latest *stable* portage. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
There are others in the unstable branch with the latest cutting-edge features. |
| 22 |
Lucky for us, Zac has done an excellent job in the last year of stopping just |
| 23 |
short of the bleeding edge |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives