Archives
Archives
| From: | maxim wexler <blissfix@×××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 <no pipe>" |
| Date: | Mon, 09 Apr 2007 01:54:56 |
| Message-Id: | 739325.15429.qm@web31706.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| 1 | Hi group, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I note two schools of thought on the best CFLAGS for |
| 4 | the Pentium III processor. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | One suggests using -O3 -pipe, the other, -O2 without |
| 7 | the pipe. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | How much difference does this make? Is the extra level |
| 10 | of optimization with pipe the equivalent of the lower |
| 11 | level without? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -mw |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | ____________________________________________________________________________________ |
| 18 | Never miss an email again! |
| 19 | Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. |
| 20 | http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ |
| 21 | -- |
| 22 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 <no pipe>" | Sascha Hlusiak <saschahlusiak@×××××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 <no pipe>" | Andrey Gerasimenko <gak@××××××.ru> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: CFLAGS "...-O3 -pipe" vs "...O2 <no pipe>" | Alexander Skwar <listen@×××××××××××××××.name> |