1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Howdy all, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Once a month or so, or when told to by a news item, I run emerge with |
5 |
> the --depclean option. I look at the list in case there something there |
6 |
> I want to keep or something that shouldn't be removed, like gcc or |
7 |
> something. I ran it a bit ago and got back this: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
>>>>> These are the packages that would be unmerged: |
11 |
>> dev-lang/vala |
12 |
>> selected: 0.52.10 |
13 |
>> protected: none |
14 |
>> omitted: 0.54.7 0.56.1 |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles |
17 |
>> selected: 250 |
18 |
>> protected: none |
19 |
>> omitted: none |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> dev-libs/rapidjson |
22 |
>> selected: 1.1.0-r3 |
23 |
>> protected: none |
24 |
>> omitted: none |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> sys-fs/udev |
27 |
>> selected: 250 |
28 |
>> protected: none |
29 |
>> omitted: none |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> sys-devel/clang |
32 |
>> selected: 13.0.1 |
33 |
>> protected: none |
34 |
>> omitted: 14.0.4 |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> sys-devel/clang-runtime |
37 |
>> selected: 13.0.1 |
38 |
>> protected: none |
39 |
>> omitted: 14.0.4 |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>> sys-libs/compiler-rt |
42 |
>> selected: 13.0.1 |
43 |
>> protected: none |
44 |
>> omitted: 14.0.4 |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers |
47 |
>> selected: 13.0.1 |
48 |
>> protected: none |
49 |
>> omitted: 14.0.4 |
50 |
>> |
51 |
>> sys-devel/llvm |
52 |
>> selected: 13.0.1 |
53 |
>> protected: none |
54 |
>> omitted: 14.0.4 |
55 |
>> |
56 |
>> All selected packages: =sys-devel/clang-runtime-13.0.1 |
57 |
>> =sys-libs/compiler-rt-13.0.1 =sys-libs/compiler-rt-sanitizers-13.0.1 |
58 |
>> =sys-devel/clang-13.0.1 =dev-lang/vala-0.52.10 |
59 |
>> =sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles-250 =sys-fs/udev-250 =sys-devel/llvm-13.0.1 |
60 |
>> =dev-libs/rapidjson-1.1.0-r3 |
61 |
>> |
62 |
>>>>> 'Selected' packages are slated for removal. |
63 |
>>>>> 'Protected' and 'omitted' packages will not be removed. |
64 |
>> Would you like to unmerge these packages? [Yes/No] |
65 |
> |
66 |
> |
67 |
> The part that has me concerned is sys-fs/udev. There's another that I'm |
68 |
> not sure about but that one caught my eye right away. I don't recall |
69 |
> seeing anything posted on -dev about switching to something else or udev |
70 |
> no longer being needed and being removed. I'm confused here. Isn't the |
71 |
> virtual supposed to prevent this from being removed? Is this a portage |
72 |
> change or did I mess something up somewhere? |
73 |
> |
74 |
> This is what I show here depending either on the virtual or udev itself. |
75 |
> |
76 |
> |
77 |
>> root@fireball / # equery d sys-fs/udev |
78 |
>> * These packages depend on sys-fs/udev: |
79 |
>> virtual/libudev-232-r7 (!systemd ? |
80 |
>> sys-fs/udev[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]) |
81 |
>> virtual/udev-217-r5 (sys-fs/udev) |
82 |
>> root@fireball / # equery d virtual/udev |
83 |
>> * These packages depend on virtual/udev: |
84 |
>> app-crypt/zulucrypt-5.5.0_pre20180223 (udev ? virtual/udev) |
85 |
>> app-pda/usbmuxd-1.1.1 (virtual/udev) |
86 |
>> dev-libs/libinput-1.20.1 (virtual/udev) |
87 |
>> media-video/vlc-3.0.17.4 (udev ? virtual/udev) |
88 |
>> net-misc/dhcpcd-9.4.1 (udev ? virtual/udev) |
89 |
>> sys-block/f3-8.0 (extra ? virtual/udev) |
90 |
>> sys-fs/cryptmount-5.3.3-r2 (udev ? virtual/udev) |
91 |
>> sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-34 (>=virtual/udev-217) |
92 |
>> sys-fs/udisks-2.9.4 (virtual/udev) |
93 |
>> sys-kernel/dracut-055-r4 (virtual/udev) |
94 |
>> sys-libs/libblockdev-2.26 (lvm ? virtual/udev) |
95 |
>> sys-power/nut-2.7.4-r8 (virtual/udev) |
96 |
>> sys-power/upower-0.99.17 (kernel_linux ? virtual/udev) |
97 |
>> virtual/dev-manager-0-r2 (virtual/udev) |
98 |
>> x11-misc/spacefm-1.0.6-r1 (virtual/udev) |
99 |
>> xfce-base/thunar-4.16.11 (udisks ? virtual/udev) |
100 |
>> xfce-extra/thunar-volman-4.16.0 (virtual/udev) |
101 |
>> root@fireball / # |
102 |
> |
103 |
> This is the packages I have installed containing udev. |
104 |
> |
105 |
> |
106 |
>> root@fireball / # equery list *udev* |
107 |
>> * Searching for *udev* ... |
108 |
>> [IP-] [ ] dev-libs/libgudev-237-r1:0/0 |
109 |
>> [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/udev-250:0 |
110 |
>> [IP-] [ ] sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-34:0 |
111 |
>> [IP-] [ ] virtual/libudev-232-r7:0/1 |
112 |
>> [IP-] [ ] virtual/udev-217-r5:0 |
113 |
>> root@fireball / # |
114 |
> |
115 |
> |
116 |
> Anyone have ideas on this? I mess up something? Catch the tree in a |
117 |
> bad state? Something else I'm not aware of? It's not making sense to |
118 |
> me yet. :/ |
119 |
> |
120 |
> Thanks. |
121 |
> |
122 |
> Dale |
123 |
> |
124 |
> :-) :-) |
125 |
> |
126 |
|
127 |
|
128 |
I think I found something but not sure if it is what I think it is. The |
129 |
virtual says it needs one of the following: |
130 |
|
131 |
|
132 |
sys-apps/systemd-utils[udev] |
133 |
sys-fs/udev |
134 |
>=sys-fs/eudev-2.1.1 |
135 |
>=sys-apps/systemd-217 |
136 |
|
137 |
|
138 |
Since systemd-utils is at the top, I looked to see if it was installed |
139 |
or not, and it is. |
140 |
|
141 |
[IP-] [ ] sys-apps/systemd-utils-250.7:0 |
142 |
|
143 |
as is: |
144 |
|
145 |
sys-fs/udev-250 |
146 |
|
147 |
|
148 |
So, I think it wants to remove udev and use the other. This is what |
149 |
depends on the systemd package. |
150 |
|
151 |
|
152 |
root@fireball / # equery d sys-apps/systemd-utils |
153 |
* These packages depend on sys-apps/systemd-utils: |
154 |
sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles-250 (sys-apps/systemd-utils[tmpfiles]) |
155 |
sys-fs/udev-250 |
156 |
(sys-apps/systemd-utils[udev,abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]) |
157 |
virtual/libudev-232-r7 (!systemd ? |
158 |
sys-apps/systemd-utils[udev,abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?,abi_s390_32(-)?,abi_s390_64(-)?]) |
159 |
virtual/tmpfiles-0-r3 (!prefix-guest ? sys-apps/systemd-utils[tmpfiles]) |
160 |
virtual/udev-217-r5 (sys-apps/systemd-utils[udev]) |
161 |
root@fireball / # |
162 |
|
163 |
|
164 |
At this point, I'm stumped. It looks like something depends on itself |
165 |
or something. < me thinks > |
166 |
|
167 |
Does this helps anybody that understands this? |
168 |
|
169 |
Dale |
170 |
|
171 |
:-) :-) |