| 1 |
Also, how do I fix the portage tree so that the new perl-5.8.8-r2 |
| 2 |
ebuild is not detected as corrupt? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2/28/07, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> Is the fixed perl-5.8.8-r2.ebuild yet merged to the main portage tree? |
| 6 |
> Because IAKMITA if I could fix this with emerge --sync |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> On 2/28/07, Peter Alfredsen <peteralf@×××××××.dk> wrote: |
| 9 |
> > On Thursday 01 March 2007, Andrey Vul wrote: |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > > Weird thing is, portage had same call stack until I did emerge -O |
| 12 |
> > > libperl. But still, perl failed to compile. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > I am using stage1-2006-x86 tarball and am now between |
| 15 |
> > > stage1(/usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh) and stage2 (emerge -e |
| 16 |
> > > system). |
| 17 |
> > > I know stage1 is unsupported, but I want extreme optimization that |
| 18 |
> > > might break the stage3 tarball packages during emerge world |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > There is a bug for this: |
| 21 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168312 |
| 22 |
> > and a patch even. Compiles for me. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > -- |
| 25 |
> > /PA |
| 26 |
> > -- |
| 27 |
> > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
> > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> --------------------- |
| 34 |
> Andrey Vul |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
--------------------- |
| 40 |
Andrey Vul |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives