1 |
"J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On November 20, 2016 6:21:40 AM GMT+01:00, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>On 20/11/2016 02:59, Harry Putnam wrote: |
5 |
>>> An emerge of webkitgtk-2.14.2 has been running for over 2hrs. I |
6 |
>>> wonder if I am starving my vbox vm of gentoo with 3GB or ram. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> Top's cpu usage is fluxuating between 45% and 99% during this compile |
9 |
>>> |
10 |
>>> Portage pulling 99% by itself at times. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> I thought 3GB was a bit high for a vm compared to what I've given |
13 |
>>debian |
14 |
>>> vms... can anyone give some guidance about how much ram to allow a |
15 |
>>> gentoo vm in Vbox? |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>>> I'm on a windows 10 host with 32 GB ram but running a number of vms. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>>Depends on what you are compiling. webkitgtk is a brute, so is |
22 |
>>thunderbird, libreoffice and other usual culprits. Those sorts of build |
23 |
>>systems need as much ram as you can spare whereas the rest of the time |
24 |
>>vm itself needs as much as it needs to do whatever it is you want it to |
25 |
>>do. |
26 |
>> |
27 |
>>What hypervisor are you using, and can you use memory ballooning? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> MS Windows desktop OSes are not the best platforms to run multiple VMs on. |
30 |
|
31 |
I'm just experimenting with several OS's ... The Vbox vms I run for |
32 |
actual work are hosted on Solaris x86 (openindiana) |
33 |
|
34 |
> Also, overcommitting CPUs has a bad influence on performance, |
35 |
> especially if the host wants to use all cores as well. |
36 |
|
37 |
That is what I asked advice about. What do you call |
38 |
`overcommitting'. For example with only 1 Vbox vm started and no |
39 |
serious work being done by the windwos-10 os. On an HP xw8600 with |
40 |
older 2x Xeon 5.60 3.00Ghz with 32 GB ram |