Archives
Archives
| From: | Mark David Dumlao <madumlao@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile | ||
| Date: | Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:01:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 6e2210230904010801k40deaf69n8b62ca1c1ac4b27e@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile by Steven Lembark |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Steven Lembark <lembark@×××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > The scheme works rather nicely in nearly |
| 3 | > every situation (POSIX ACL's play hell with |
| 4 | > the scheme, but, then, they are supposed to). |
| 5 | That being said, is there anyone who swears by ACLs here? I've never |
| 6 | tried them on (except in a couple of "classroom exercises" years ago), |
| 7 | so I don't know if they're any joy. Would they allow me to force all |
| 8 | files under a directory, for instance, to be something like g+rw and |
| 9 | at the same time be enrolled in a shared group? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile | Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) |
| Re: [gentoo-user] umask 002 in /etc/profile | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |