1 |
On 26 September 2011 16:01, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> I don't know if you have seen this. Given that we're moving into UEFI |
3 |
> boot what are the workarounds to compensate for Microsoft's efforts to |
4 |
> exclude other operating systems from available hardware? |
5 |
|
6 |
My opinion is that signed boot is probably on its way (despite not |
7 |
actually offering much in the way of security, as the Apple Battery |
8 |
hack has shown), and so we'll enter an era where you have the option |
9 |
between a fully-signed system (Windows 9 / OS XI or so) or a cracked |
10 |
boot, with little in the way of switching between the two, at least |
11 |
initially |
12 |
|
13 |
I know which one I'd pick if it came down to it :) |