Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:26:52
Message-Id: 5491CAE4.7070208@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd by Harry Putnam
1 Harry Putnam wrote:
2 > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> writes:
3 >
4 >> What was supposed to be attached again? ;-)
5 >>
6 >> Dale
7 > hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the
8 > attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments
9 > are allowed...
10 >
11 > Here is it is inline:
12 >
13 > ------- ------- ---=--- ------- -------
14 > NOTE: [-ed HP The ebuild referred to can be gotten on the gmane group
15 > that appears in Jonathan's headers below, if anyone is interested ]
16 > ------- ------- ---=--- ------- -------
17 >
18 > From: Jonathan Thibault <jonathan@×××××××.com>
19 > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.desktop.lxde.devel
20 > Subject: Re: main menu `run' item produces no dialog
21 > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:36:05 -0500
22 >
23 > [...] snipped piles of headers
24 >
25 > The version of lxpanel included in gentoo actually segfaults when using
26 > 'run'. You should see it crash and respawn.
27 >
28 > This is fixed under the new version of lxpanel but gentoo isn't pushing
29 > it yet. There's extensive fixes in lxterminal 0.2.0 which is also not
30 > included in gentoo.
31 >
32 > I've included a couple ebuilds for convenience though they might not
33 > work right now since sourceforge in emergency maintenance mode.
34 >
35 >
36 > Jonathan
37 >
38
39 It made it to the list and folks attach stuff a lot so it is allowed.
40 Anyway, we were likely typing at about the same time. I just wanted to
41 make sure you knew it wasn't attached.
42
43 Senior moment? I'm 47 here and do this sort of thing quite often. I
44 hope I'm not *to* senior. lol
45
46 Dale
47
48 :-) :-)