| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm not affected by anything regarding the /usr switch, but I'd like |
| 3 |
> to have a good talk with the first person who decided a |
| 4 |
> system-critical binary belonged in /usr instead of /bin or /sbin. |
| 5 |
> They've created a mess for every distro and any project that depends |
| 6 |
> on their work. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As I've pointed out before: |
| 9 |
- "system-critical" is actually dependent on the system. A system dependent |
| 10 |
on an smb share will find smbmount system critical. One dependent on |
| 11 |
zfs-fuse will find fuse system critical. With the advent of fuse, arbitrary |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 17 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSSMu5AAoJEJUrb08JgYgHFz4H/iyZt6MlTeW702KOlIy2Ydse |
| 20 |
> mzsfiyPfPz8Rbz0Mqp5/17R8aQzOUG4l6dZS7d9HFKuMCG7t+kNZCSvxD69XeTVO |
| 21 |
> tZY6YjHCGQaE6WaAMbiasXfRTeRt4ZDtP5l/lCUsYcTCWN13PyIcHCb5rGNHnHqq |
| 22 |
> J/OcSeF5EoS+G/uSAuzDVaQ5wa0Z0qkqVSqQGjJ5NUHYIA5ZrtYpMNDR+MkFYYAB |
| 23 |
> 7I4JE5kDXRYoBSiLLDb7tI7F1nGogHXxzECmMYW4ZneU0AJwhUAK0kU+oTHY2Z9Q |
| 24 |
> 8TcjpdaG1BH4gA2NT+i+ZJz4XNqkMPa2vbvhcfGFs9Dg7IwabiuunOzh0GQM1S4= |
| 25 |
> =jgci |
| 26 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [ ] social |
| 33 |
Response needed: [ ] yes [ ] up to you [ ] no |
| 34 |
Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [ ] none |
Archives