From: | Francesco Turco <fturco@××××××××.fm> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM | ||
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:01:31 | ||
Message-Id: | 1394640063.613.2.camel@desktop | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] MD5SUM by Guido Budack |
1 | > is the published MD5-hash still valid? |
2 | |
3 | $ md5sum livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
4 | e86da868be423283ec167725390faefc livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
5 | |
6 | Yes, the published MD5 hash is still valid. |
7 | |
8 | > Further, how big is the resulting file exactly? |
9 | |
10 | $ du -b livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
11 | 4198498304 livedvd-amd64-multilib-20121221.iso |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM | Guido Budack <glaivy@××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-user] MD5SUM | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |