From: | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] portage wants to remove less and nano | ||
Date: | Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:05:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 4E8F06C9.8040704@orlitzky.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] portage wants to remove less and nano by Alan McKinnon |
1 | On 10/07/2011 03:30 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 | > |
3 | > Didn't we thrash this one to death already 2 months ago? |
4 | > |
5 | > Wasn't Zac's response that virtuals are inappropriate in the system set? |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | I didn't pay too much attention back then, but for your second question, |
9 | these are all @system: |
10 | |
11 | *virtual/dev-manager |
12 | *virtual/editor |
13 | *virtual/libc |
14 | *virtual/man |
15 | *virtual/os-headers |
16 | *virtual/package-manager |
17 | *virtual/pager |
18 | *virtual/ssh |