| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wed, 06. Feb, Volker Armin Hemmann spammed my inbox with |
| 5 |
<snip> |
| 6 |
> not needed anymore either. flash does work in the 'normal' firefox just fine. |
| 7 |
Come again? I would be very glad to finally ditch the binary firefox, but using nspluginwrapper |
| 8 |
didn't work. You can use netscape-flash with a 64-bit-compiled firefox? Please tell me how. |
| 9 |
> > compromises (admittedly some minor). I realize I should see some speed |
| 10 |
> > increase but probably only in certain areas such as compiling. |
| 11 |
Probably negeclable... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> > So, for those users who have used both, is it worth it overall? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
Yeah, actually running 64 bits is pretty easy, you only need to be willing to unmask some packages |
| 16 |
sometimes and/or scrounge around bugzilla for working ebuilds (yes, ghdl, I'm looking at you!) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
- -- |
| 19 |
thenybble.de/blog/ -- four bits at a time |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFHqX/PMmLQdC6jvocRAlmiAJ0RmKtN9o85/6KKAXGYdwru+LTbkQCeJ5YD |
| 24 |
qsrYtyHvJjZpCnv1knaXy78= |
| 25 |
=RvsZ |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives