Archives
Archives
| From: | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:39:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E42EC49.6040103@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? by Thanasis |
||
| 1 | Thanasis wrote: |
| 2 | > on 08/10/2011 09:48 PM Joost Roeleveld wrote the following: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | >> Comment 2 "Update CPU AGESA code" might help. You'd need to google for what |
| 6 | >> AGESA means. |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGESA |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Yea, I googled it too. Basically, it is to support newer CPUs. Since |
| 15 | my CPU works, that shouldn't be the problem. I'll wait until it at |
| 16 | least gets out of beta. ;-) We all know my record on breaking things. |
| 17 | lol |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Dale |
| 20 | |
| 21 | :-) :-) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? | pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> |