Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60%
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 11:54:18
Message-Id: 53AEACDF.9030105@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% by Mick
1 Mick wrote:
2 > On Friday 27 Jun 2014 21:54:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
3 >> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:22:09 +0100, Mick wrote:
4 >>> I would think that your ISP providers in the US will be blocking
5 >>> outgoing port 25 to stop compromised MSWindows machines spamming the
6 >>> rest of us. If you use my suggestion there shouldn't be a problem.
7 >> It makes no difference whether you address it directly to your ISP
8 >> address or via an alias. The ISP won't block port 25 connections to its
9 >> own servers from its own customers, otherwise none of them could send
10 >> email at all!
11 > In the US many big players are blocking outbound port 25 for their customers
12 > as a blanket measure to control spam from botnets, e.g.:
13 >
14 > http://www.verizon.com/Support/Residential/internet/highspeed/general+support/top+questions/questionsone/124274.htm
15 >
16 > If Dale uses the ssmtp.conf I sent he will be using a different port + TLS
17 > encryption and should not have a problem.
18 >
19 > Even if Dale's ISP does not block port 25 for connections to the ISP's *own*
20 > mail servers, it may well block it to other providers' mail addresses for the
21 > same reason. This was a common practice some years back (pre-Gmail) when ISP
22 > had started charging for mail services.
23 >
24
25 According to the settings in Seamonkey, it should be port 995 and
26 SSL/TLS. I used your "basic" setup which is port 465. It works tho.
27 :-)
28
29 Dale
30
31 :-) :-)