| 1 |
On 2010-05-13 7:21 PM, walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> AFAIK most laptops don't (yet) have 2TB disks, which is why Vista is |
| 3 |
> a poor choice for laptops. Vista needs most of a terabyte after |
| 4 |
> installing all the bug fixes and service packs |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Ok, either you are joking (but the wording doesn't make that very |
| 7 |
clear), or you are just one of those antimicrosoft idiot/trolls. If you |
| 8 |
were joking, then obviously the latter doesn't apply to you, though you |
| 9 |
might want to make the joke a little more evident... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A fully patched Vista/Windows7 system might require as much as 7-8+ GB, |
| 12 |
which is, what... about .9% of a Terabyte? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I'm not saying that 8GB is not ridiculously high for a core OS install, |
| 15 |
of course it is... |
Archives