1 |
On 03/06/2014 16:29, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Silvio Siefke <siefke_listen@×××.de> wrote: |
3 |
>> Hello, |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> mean this i must install now systemd? What can do when i not want systemd. |
6 |
>> The system what i have is good, i want not change to systemd. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> [ebuild U ~] sys-devel/gettext-0.19 [0.18.3.2] USE="acl cxx ncurses nls openmp -cvs -doc -emacs -git -java -static-libs" 16,221 kB |
9 |
>> [ebuild R ] dev-libs/glib-2.38.2-r1:2 USE="(mime%*) -debug (-fam) (-selinux) -static-libs -systemtap {-test} -utils -xattr" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 (-python2_6)" 0 kB |
10 |
>> [ebuild N ] sys-apps/systemd-208-r3:0/1 USE="acl filecaps firmware-loader gudev introspection kmod pam policykit python tcpd -audit -cryptsetup -doc -gcrypt -http -lzma -qrcode (-selinux) {-test} -vanilla -xattr" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python2_7 -python3_2 -python3_3" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_3 -python3_2" 2,335 kB |
11 |
>> [ebuild N ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-2 51 kB |
12 |
>> [ebuild N ] sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 USE="introspection -doc -ios" 0 kB |
13 |
>> [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev ("sys-fs/udev" is blocking sys-apps/systemd-208-r3) |
14 |
>> [blocks B ] sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration ("sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration" is blocking sys-fs/udev-212-r1) |
15 |
>> [blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd ("sys-apps/systemd" is blocking sys-fs/udev-212-r1) |
16 |
>> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> If I understood correctly, you need to: |
19 |
> |
20 |
> emerge -C sys-power/upower |
21 |
> emerge -1v sys-power/upower-pm-utils |
22 |
> |
23 |
> and then update world as usual. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The changes in upower does not make systemd mandatory, but you need to |
26 |
> switch from upower (which now has systemd as a hard dependency) to |
27 |
> upower-pm-utils (which depends on the unmaintined pm-utils). |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Regards. |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
That is correct. There is a vocal debate going on in -dev right now |
35 |
about this and a proposed news item is in the works. here's the current |
36 |
proposed item which might change but at least explains what is going on: |
37 |
|
38 |
Do note that emerging upower-pm-utils (what you should do is you want to |
39 |
keep things the way they were) needs upower to be unmerged first. That |
40 |
part isn't mentioned in the news item, but portage lets you know real |
41 |
quick anyway. i.e. upower-pm-utils replaces current upower to restore |
42 |
old upower feature set |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
========== |
47 |
UPower discontinued hibernate and suspend support in favor of systemd. |
48 |
Because of this, we have created a compability package at |
49 |
sys-power/upower-pm-utils which will give you the old UPower with |
50 |
sys-power/pm-utils support back. |
51 |
Some desktops have integrated the sys-power/pm-utils support directly |
52 |
to their code, like Xfce, and as a result, they work also with the new |
53 |
UPower as expected. |
54 |
|
55 |
All non-systemd users are recommended to choose between: |
56 |
|
57 |
# emerge --noreplace 'sys-power/upower-pm-utils' |
58 |
|
59 |
or |
60 |
|
61 |
# emerge --noreplace '>=sys-power/upower-0.99.0' |
62 |
|
63 |
However, all systemd users are recommended to stay with sys-power/upower. |
64 |
=========== |
65 |
|
66 |
-- |
67 |
Alan McKinnon |
68 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |