| 1 |
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23:49:45 darren kirby wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I do have a separate /usr, but do not mount it readonly, as I |
| 4 |
> > --sync enough to make remounting it daily rather annoying. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Congratulations! You've just explained why PORTDIR defaulting to |
| 7 |
> /usr/portage is stupid. The logical location for the tree would be on |
| 8 |
> /var ... :) |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You are perfectly correct. That's why I have: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
alan@nazgul ~ $ mount | grep /var |
| 13 |
/dev/mapper/vg-var on /var type reiserfs (rw,noatime,notail) |
| 14 |
/dev/mapper/vg-portage on /var/portage type reiserfs (rw,noatime) |
| 15 |
/dev/mapper/vg-distfiles on /var/distfiles type reiserfs |
| 16 |
(rw,noatime,notail) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Note that distfiles is not a sub-dir of portage either |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
| 22 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
| 23 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 26 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
| 27 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives