1 |
Am 17.04.2010 23:32, schrieb Jonathan: |
2 |
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:45:57 +0100 |
3 |
> David W Noon<dwnoon@××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> In fact, POSIX capabilities are a mechanism to *reduce* a program's |
6 |
>> permissions, not increase them. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It's true that Linux "capabilities" are used to replace SUID and that does reduce the programs permissions. |
9 |
> On the other hand programs like Wine. Which no one would never run with SUID could be run with CAP_NET_RAW. |
10 |
> That would be a increase in permissions. Wine needs to be able to ping because some program need to use IPX[1], |
11 |
> Like Red Alert 2. Someone has made a patch for Red Alert 2 to use TCP/IP and I can not think of another program off the top of my head. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> That information came from "man 7 capabilities". So I guess it's all about how you look at it. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internetwork_Packet_Exchange |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Sounds a little like putting someone in prison and than telling him |
19 |
walking through the prison yard is increasing his freedom. |
20 |
|
21 |
kh |