Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Max R.D. Parmer" <maxp@××××××××.is>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 14:31:44
Message-Id: 1464877889.3249948.625957281.651B2BA7@webmail.messagingengine.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo? by James
1 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016, at 06:44, James wrote:
2 > Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes:
3 >
4 >
5 > > > Does this mean we need to do anything to improve the security of our
6 > > > systems?
7 >
8 > > The report seems to be saying that the problem is caused by using the
9 > > Gentoo default config, which assumes a Gentoo environment. So it's fine
10 > > on Gentoo. But it won't hurt to run glsa-check from time to time (my sync
11 > > script does it every time and mails me if there's a problem).
12 >
13 > Which file contains the purported malaised default configration?
14 > I just want to manually inspect it and verify for myself.
15
16 /etc/pam.d/system-auth which is provided by pambase:
17 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/pambase.git/

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo? James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>