1 |
Mark Knecht wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Helmut Jarausch |
5 |
>> <jarausch@××××××××××××××××.de> wrote: |
6 |
>> > On 23 Feb, Mark Knecht wrote: |
7 |
>> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:53 PM, walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
8 |
>> >>> On 02/23/2010 06:23 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: |
9 |
>> >>>> |
10 |
>> >>>> Hi, |
11 |
>> >>>> ?? ??I'm looking around in vain for info on why some apps (Open Office |
12 |
>> >>>> apps for instance) see printers while other apps (Evolution and |
13 |
>> >>>> Firefox for instance) do not. Apps that don't work seem to offer print |
14 |
>> >>>> to file and print to LPR. On the other hand Open Office provides only |
15 |
>> >>>> the obscenely ugly CUPS printer name |
16 |
>> >>>> "HP_LaserJet_M1522nf_MFP_192.168.1.5". |
17 |
>> >>> |
18 |
>> > |
19 |
>> > Just one note, |
20 |
>> > are you using a binary version of firefox, etc, on a 64 bit machine? |
21 |
>> > I had the same problem here. |
22 |
>> > This was easily solved by replacing the binary version by the native |
23 |
>> > (freshly compiled) version here. |
24 |
>> > Helmut. |
25 |
>> > |
26 |
>> > -- |
27 |
>> > Helmut Jarausch |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> Thanks but no. In fact the one binary thing on the system that comes |
30 |
>> to mind is Open Office in which printing is working. It's the stuff |
31 |
>> I'm building that isn't! |
32 |
>> |
33 |
>> - Mark |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
Hello, |
37 |
|
38 |
Is this anything to do with GTK? I have the same problem, in cups it is |
39 |
fine, but say something like xpdf or firefox and only the print lpr is |
40 |
there. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Regards, |
45 |
Roundyz |