1 |
Mark David Dumlao schrieb: |
2 |
[...] |
3 |
> If the memo appears somewhere, it might have to do with some transient |
4 |
> step of the subscription process. That does make it hard to find now |
5 |
> that I'm looking for it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> What's up with html e-mails, btw? Most public emails send html e-mail |
8 |
> by default, and one imagines that there would be a wide range of |
9 |
> capabilities from the readers in the portage tree... |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
I'll just link to: |
13 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_e-mail |
14 |
|
15 |
Concerning the missing netiquette: |
16 |
It no issue of the mailing list providers, no official policy. It's |
17 |
rather personal preference (or ability) of the members of this list. |
18 |
|
19 |
There are various reasons why it is generally disliked to use HTML-emails: |
20 |
|
21 |
- They unnecessarily make messages larger (especially if you also |
22 |
provide a plain text variant). |
23 |
- Users of mutt and other text mail readers will most likely have to |
24 |
filter your HTML. |
25 |
- There are security concerns with spam, phishing and so on. Therefore |
26 |
many of us never even take a look at the HTML-version of a mail (a |
27 |
simple mail reader setting). |
28 |
- There are accessibility concerns. |
29 |
- They are usually just unnecessary (unless you need tables or such |
30 |
alike in which case I would send them as a separate HTML-part and use |
31 |
the plain text part to explain why you need it). |
32 |
|
33 |
HTH |