Archives
Archives
| From: | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Replacements for ivman | ||
| Date: | Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:01:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 48F1141E.4070208@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Replacements for ivman by Erik Hahn |
||
| 1 | Erik Hahn wrote: |
| 2 | > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 05:24:27PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >> Quoting Erik Hahn <erik_hahn@×××.de>: |
| 5 | >> |
| 6 | >> |
| 7 | >>> Does software rot when it's unmaintained or why is that a problem? |
| 8 | >>> |
| 9 | >> No, but it develops incompatibilities over time... |
| 10 | >> |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > So far, it works fine. |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | +1 |
| 16 | |
| 17 | If something works, why does it need to be updated? |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Dale |
| 20 | |
| 21 | :-) :-) |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Replacements for ivman | Alex Schuster <wonko@×××××××××.org> |