Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: s6 et al
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:55:55
Message-Id: loom.20131003T144417-41@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] s6 et al by William Hubbs
1 William Hubbs <williamh <at> gentoo.org> writes:
2
3
4 > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:04:24AM -0500, Bruce Hill wrote:
5 > > Just stumbled across some very interesting software/ideas:
6 > >
7 > > http://skarnet.org/poweredby.html
8
9 > Yes, I have been looking at this for a few days, and some of the other
10 > members of the OpenRC team are interested in it as well.
11
12 I'm not too sure about the kernel sources:
13 "is provided by Gandi and cannot be modified"
14
15 My experiences with embedded *nix is that the kernel sources
16 are tinkered with, almost constantly to infinity......
17
18 You'd be wise to post to the gentoo-embedded group, where
19 those learking in the shadows (memory crevaces) have
20 lots of experiences with a multitude of embedded ventures.
21
22 Most embedded ventures end up on the waste heap; they made
23 critical decision that leave the effort..........borked.
24 I'd research into the coding+user community, as being
25 naked and alone on an embedded vetnure, does give rise to
26 abandonment.
27
28 Another consideration is the processor architecture(s) that
29 the codebase runs on. Most embedded and high end processor
30 efforts are looking at LOW POWER architectures, as the thrust
31 of all future efforts. This means on ARM or ARM+x86 or such.
32
33
34 That said, the project does look attractive.
35
36 caveat emptor.
37 hth,
38 James

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: s6 et al Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>