1 |
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:42:52 -0500 |
2 |
Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.EDU> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:39:30PM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale squawked: |
5 |
|
6 |
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:05:58PM -0600, Penguin Lover Steven |
7 |
> Susbauer squawked: |
8 |
> > Some mail readers convert *asterisks* as bold statements. I believe |
9 |
> > it is the generally accepted way to make a section stand out when |
10 |
> > dealing with plain text. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Ah. Yes, slrn does that also for newsgroups. I've always thought of |
13 |
> that as 'emphasis' and not 'bold', probably because I see it more |
14 |
> often printed with the asterisks then as bold text. So my apologies |
15 |
> that Dale's reference was lost on me. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> However, this begs the question: on such a mail reader, if I write: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> rm -rf *.* |
20 |
> |
21 |
> does it show up just as 'rm -rf <one extra dark dot>'? ;) |
22 |
|
23 |
The mangling of asterisks which aren't meant to be markup is a pretty |
24 |
good reason to turn the feature off, IMO. But slrn honors a way around |
25 |
it ... by introducing more markup, the so-called verbatim marks. I |
26 |
think some other clients now honor them also, though slrn documentation |
27 |
still says it's the only one. |
28 |
|
29 |
<http://slrn.sourceforge.net/docs/slrn-manual-6.html#process_verbatim_marks> |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
»Q« |
33 |
Kleeneness is next to Gödelness. |