Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Hard to find netiquette, enculturation bug. (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] GNOME: Cant logout and Lock Screen is showing different background from GNOME screensaver)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:45:38
Message-Id: 20081222003417.5e33fb62@bellgrove.remarqs.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Hard to find netiquette, enculturation bug. (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] GNOME: Cant logout and Lock Screen is showing different background from GNOME screensaver) by Willie Wong
1 On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:42:52 -0500
2 Willie Wong <wwong@×××××××××.EDU> wrote:
3
4 > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:39:30PM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale squawked:
5
6 > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:05:58PM -0600, Penguin Lover Steven
7 > Susbauer squawked:
8 > > Some mail readers convert *asterisks* as bold statements. I believe
9 > > it is the generally accepted way to make a section stand out when
10 > > dealing with plain text.
11 >
12 > Ah. Yes, slrn does that also for newsgroups. I've always thought of
13 > that as 'emphasis' and not 'bold', probably because I see it more
14 > often printed with the asterisks then as bold text. So my apologies
15 > that Dale's reference was lost on me.
16 >
17 > However, this begs the question: on such a mail reader, if I write:
18 >
19 > rm -rf *.*
20 >
21 > does it show up just as 'rm -rf <one extra dark dot>'? ;)
22
23 The mangling of asterisks which aren't meant to be markup is a pretty
24 good reason to turn the feature off, IMO. But slrn honors a way around
25 it ... by introducing more markup, the so-called verbatim marks. I
26 think some other clients now honor them also, though slrn documentation
27 still says it's the only one.
28
29 <http://slrn.sourceforge.net/docs/slrn-manual-6.html#process_verbatim_marks>
30
31 --
32 »Q«
33 Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.