1 |
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:40:02 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Myself, I don't consider that either a stage 1 or stage 3 leaves me with |
4 |
> more than a minimally functional system after the initial install, but a |
5 |
> stage 3 leaves me with a *higher functioning* minimal install than a |
6 |
> stage 1 does. |
7 |
|
8 |
A stage 3 install doesn't give you any more than a stage 1. all it means |
9 |
is you skip some laborious and time-consuming steps in the handbook, you |
10 |
end up in the same place. |
11 |
|
12 |
> But at least after a stage 3, I don't have to be *uncomfortable* while |
13 |
> I'm waiting to get my system up to my personal spec-- I can still *use* |
14 |
> Mozilla, even if it's compiled with Mail, and Composer, and IRC, while I |
15 |
> wait for it to recompile with the -moz*** USE flags. |
16 |
|
17 |
You can't, stage 3 doesn't even include X. However, you can use the GRP |
18 |
packages with a stage 3 installation, because the flags are all at |
19 |
default, so you can merge your preferred DE, mail and browser as binary |
20 |
packages in a few minutes. |
21 |
|
22 |
If you like ~arch, you don't even need an emerge --emptytree after the |
23 |
system is running, as emerge -uDN world after changing KEYWORDS and |
24 |
USE will update just about everything anyway. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Neil Bothwick |
29 |
|
30 |
Any program which runs right is obsolete. |