1 |
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 11:31 AM Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Sunday, 10 June 2018 19:07:59 BST Wol's lists wrote: |
4 |
> > On 10/06/18 17:53, Mick wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Sunday, 10 June 2018 01:31:50 BST Hilco Wijbenga wrote: |
6 |
> > >> Okay, with all that advice, I gave it another try. I'm also setting up |
7 |
> > >> a VirtualBox for my WFH stuff and VB wants to use 10.0.0.0 for its |
8 |
> > >> networking. I've changed this to 172.16.0.0 so now I can easily tell |
9 |
> > >> that network from work network (which seems to use 10.25.0.0) |
10 |
> > >> |
11 |
> > >> I wanted to add a route to NetworkManager's VPN connection. It wants |
12 |
> > >> Address, Network, Gateway, and Metric so I gave it "10.0.0.0", |
13 |
> > >> "255.0.0.0" (this one shows up automatically), "207.x.y.z", "1". But |
14 |
> > >> then VPN fails to start with the complaint that the configuration is |
15 |
> > >> invalid. |
16 |
> > >> |
17 |
> > >> So I tried what I think is the same on the CL: |
18 |
> > >> |
19 |
> > >> $> route add -net 10.0.0.0/8 gw "207.x.y.z" metric 1 |
20 |
> > >> SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable |
21 |
> > >> |
22 |
> > >> So apparently, it's not quite as straightforward as I thought it might |
23 |
> > >> be. |
24 |
> > >> |
25 |
> > >> :-) |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > Ahh! If you're trying to set this up within a VM, this adds a whole new |
28 |
> > > layer of complexity. I assume you're setting up a bridge between host |
29 |
> > > and guest device(s)? |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > No if he's assigned 172.16/16 to the VM network he hasn't. VB defaults |
32 |
> > to a NAT'd network and it's always given me grief. I was going to |
33 |
> > suggest he switched to bridged. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > In settings, change the network adaptor type to bridged, and then the VM |
36 |
> > will get its settings and IP address from the DHCP server serving the |
37 |
> > local network. Makes things MUCH easier. |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > Cheers, |
40 |
> > Wol |
41 |
> |
42 |
> If NAT'ed between guest and host and then NAT'ed again at the home router, you |
43 |
> are double NAT'ed. As far as I know VPNs will not work through a double NAT |
44 |
> situation, unless you use your gateway or host as the VPN end point and then |
45 |
> setup port forwarding to the host from there. Bridge the host to guest |
46 |
> adaptors and you should be good to go (once any other conventionla VPN |
47 |
> configuration problem is solved). :-) |
48 |
|
49 |
In what sense does it "not work"? I can connect just fine. |
50 |
|
51 |
If I change VB's networking to "Bridged Adapter" I don't get any |
52 |
different behaviour. |
53 |
|
54 |
(I would prefer to avoid fooling around with my main OS's networking |
55 |
so the VB route seems "safer".) |