1 |
On Sunday 17 January 2010 15:14:06 Jarry wrote: |
2 |
> > If all you are doing is making filesystems available for use, and you |
3 |
> > find you are getting involved with device names, then you are doing |
4 |
> > something contrary to current kernel/udev/userspace practice. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> If your last paragraph ist true, then it is probably time |
7 |
> to rewrite Gentoo Handbook. I just checked it, especially |
8 |
> section 4 "Preparing the Disks" and 8 "Configuring your System" |
9 |
> and did not find a word about udev, and this new concept of |
10 |
> device files (maybe time to file bug concerning Gentoo doc?). |
11 |
|
12 |
Filing a bug concerning the docs is probably your best route. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm not familiar enough with the docs to advise on what should be in the docs |
15 |
(I stopped needing to refer to them long ago), and it's also a complex patch |
16 |
that must be made. Off the top of my head, I imagine at least: |
17 |
|
18 |
- info on udev - what it is, why it is, how it works. Enough info in the main |
19 |
doc to help the user, with links to more complete data elsewhere. |
20 |
- newer methods of mounting (by LVM names, volume name, filesystem UUID). This |
21 |
will need the mkfs section also updated with coverage of all common |
22 |
filesystems and how to label a new fs |
23 |
- for users who choose to stick with /dev/ names, they will need sample |
24 |
commands to identify which disk is which - gparted, fdisk, blkid and so on |
25 |
- I'm sure even hal will rear it's ugly head in the midst of this... |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |