Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage behaviour with Masked packages - Gaim
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:48:50
Message-Id: 200802041547.03910.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage behaviour with Masked packages - Gaim by Alan McKinnon
1 On Monday 04 February 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > On Monday 04 February 2008, Michael Sullivan wrote:
3 > > Why is gaim no longer in portage?  Is it dead upstream?
4 >
5 > It's been dead for some time since AOL had a hissy fit over the name.
6 >
7 > The new gaim is now called pidgin. It's not a new product really, just a
8 > version bump that is a name change.
9 >
10 > It was hard masked in portage very recently. Unfortunately for gaim
11 > users, the upgrade consists of unmerge gaim, merge pidgin, import
12 > settings.
13
14 OK, I can surely do that, but shouldn't portage warn me about Gaim being hard
15 masked? Is my portage borked, or is this behaviour no longer valid/expected?
16 --
17 Regards,
18 Mick

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage behaviour with Masked packages - Gaim Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>