| 1 |
Hello, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Sun, 06 Sep 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 4 |
>On 09/06/2015 10:39 PM, David Haller wrote: |
| 5 |
>> Can anyone reproduce this problem? I did not have _any_ haskell |
| 6 |
>> package installed so far. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Should I open a bug? Or just wait a couple of days, sync, and try |
| 9 |
>> again without the masks? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>Yes please open a bug. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559988 |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I left ghc installed, as that had nothing to do with those conflicts. |
| 16 |
The packages pulled in by the conflicting ones on a "clean" system is |
| 17 |
so long I chose not to bother to prune the dep-tree right down from |
| 18 |
pandoc ;) For whatever reason, adding the attachment did not work for me. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Oh, and yes, I did resync portage about Sep 8 18:00 UTC (or later) yet |
| 21 |
again before getting the data for the bug, almost the same problem, |
| 22 |
but dev-haskell/tls seems to have disappeared from the conflicts, ISTR |
| 23 |
also dev-haskell/network. So it seems to be worked on already. But I |
| 24 |
guess it might be nice to have a clean slate as mine and and example |
| 25 |
like pandoc to find those hidden dep-conflicts ;) So now, there's a |
| 26 |
list. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
>> PS: does haskell have no dynamic libraries? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
>Historically no, but it's getting better. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Ah. Thanks for the enlightenment :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-dnh |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff |
| 38 |
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;) -- Linus Torvalds |
Archives