Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [way OT but interesting] Massive recent DDOS attack
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:33:33
Message-Id: 515B86DD.8000101@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] [way OT but interesting] Massive recent DDOS attack by luis jure
1 Am 01.04.2013 05:37, schrieb luis jure:
2 >
3 > i'm glad for all the people who weren't affected. but whatever it was, i've
4 > been suffering the consequences. so i'm more than irritated by the
5 > assholes minimizing the problem, or treating this as "non-news".
6 >
7 if you meant me - it is none-news. Or, it became none-news. Because:
8 everybody already reported it. Spamhaus was hit hard. But at no point
9 was 'the internet in danger'. London exchange had a bit surplus traffic
10 which resulted in some irregularities - for a whole hour. Frankfurt
11 didn't measure anything outside of the usual statistical noise.
12 http://www.de-cix.net/about/statistics/
13
14 But somebody had to blow it up. And even more people jumped on it. Boohoo.
15
16 So the next time you start insulting people, base your findings on more
17 than a blog written by those guys who have an economical interest to
18 blow the whole mess out of proportion.
19
20 300gbit/s sounds like a lot. London exchange does 1tbit/s on a normal
21 day. Frankfurt 1.5tbit/s on average.
22
23 And they have reserves.
24
25 Of course, those responsible - all those guys with unpatched boxes whose
26 little zombies took part in this attack, need a good kicking. But that
27 is no excuse for spamming mailing lists with something the media already
28 abused to no end.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [way OT but interesting] Massive recent DDOS attack luis jure <ljc@××××××××××××.uy>
Re: [gentoo-user] [way OT but interesting] Massive recent DDOS attack Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@××××××××.uk>